The Independent Assessment of Nuclear Developments in the World

Home > News > WNISR in the Media > Voice of Russia (Russia): Areas near Fukushima plant not suitable for (...)

Voice of Russia (Russia): Areas near Fukushima plant not suitable for living due to high radiation - expert

Tuesday 25 February 2014

Areas near Fukushima plant not suitable for living due to high radition - expert

Voice of Russia, 24 February 2014, 22:25

Japan said Monday it would lift an evacuation order around the troubled Fukushima nuclear power plant allowing residents to return home despite radiation concerns. Up to 30,000 residents are expected to get back to the current "no-go zone" in the next two years. Mycle Schneider, lead author of The World Nuclear Industry Status Reports, shared his take on the issue in an interview with the Voice of Russia.

Is the area around the Fukushima plant is suitable for habitation today?

No, absolutely not. I don’t think there is any question about that. I think that unfortunately there are economic considerations that come into play here because basically people moving back to their homes means they would not get compensated for loss. And thus this is very major savings for TEPCO and Japanese government. But I think it is very clear that this is not safe. In fact, people have to realize that there were hot spots identified as far away as 70 km (43 miles) from the site that were beyond the level of contamination within the exclusion zone of Chernobyl. So, there are up to now very high levels of radiation that are certainly not suitable for living.

So, is Japan willing to take the risk of human health and lives for financial benefit?

That is exactly what it looks like. You see that after the disaster happened the admissible level of doze rates have been increased by a factor of 20, which of course is relatively simple, it means that the risk is at least multiplied by a factor of 20 if you consider that on a theoretical model basis, the higher the doze is, the higher the risk, the lower the doze is, the lower the risk. And now to say that people can go back into an environment, it is not only a matter of individual homes or some private property, it is the entire environment. I mean what does it mean? Where do people go then? Where do children go to play? Where do people go to go shopping? So I think it is highly premature for that kind of message and measure.

How many people do you think will be willing to actually come back to their homes?

That would be pure speculation. It is very difficult to say. The problem is that in the past the government has measured free, if I may say so, certain properties. So, individual homes have been basically cleared for people coming back whereas the neighboring property is not cleared for people coming back. Now traditionally the Japanese people have often, for example, the parents’ home beside the children’s home. So, families get separated again through this kind of measure because it is not holistic approach to an entire area but an individual home basis. I don’t think there will be many people that would be willing to go back under these circumstances.

What They Say…

“The Report sets forth in painstaking detail the actual experience and achievements of nuclear energy around the world.”

Peter A. Bradford

Former commissioner
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
(in his foreword to the 2013 report)
“A vital public service... Uniquely independent, thorough, and timely assessment."

Amory B. Lovins

Chairman, Rocky Mountain Institute
“This annual publication has over 20 years evolved into the most reliable, strikingly original, comprehensive and penetrating assessment of the global nuclear industry.”

Praful Bidwai

Financial Chronicle
Delhi, India
"Amid the hype and PR, the smoke and mirrors, of the 'nuclear renaissance', the Status Report offers a hard-edged reality check."

Walt Patterson

Associate Fellow Chatham House
London, UK
“Fantastic piece of work. Must reading for any observer of nuclear energy."

Henri Sokolski

Executive Director Nonproliferation Policy Education Center
Washington DC, USA
“Reliable research based on cold, hard facts, unlike the hype and amnesia of industry sources.”

Scott Ludlam

“Félicitations pour la dernière édition du WNISR. Formidable comme d'habitude!”

Fulcieri Maltini

International Consultant Former Director of the Nuclear Safety Account, EBRD
“Thought-provoking as usual.”

Will Dalrymple

Editor Nuclear Engineering International
"The authoritative report on the status of nuclear power plants worldwide is the World Nuclear Industry Status Report."


Bangkok, Thailand
“Such an illuminating report.”

Sam Geall

Deputy Editor China Dialogue
London, UK
"An astounding collection of facts and figures, a myth-busting international overview… An eye-opening piece of work!"

R. Andreas Krämer

Chairman Ecologic Institute
Berlin, Germany
“I really appreciate you letting us excerpt your report! It’s incredibly well researched and comprehensive, so thank you!”

Stuart Luman

Associate Editor Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists